"STATE COMMON ENTRANCE TEST CELL, MUMBAI
" DETAILS OF COURT CASES - HIGHER EDUCATION DEPT. - (LAW , EDUCATION AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES) FROM A.Y. 2016 To A.Y. 2019".
(Bombay, Aurangabad & Nagpur Bench )"
| SN | W.P No | Subject of W.P. | BENCH | COURSE | CET RESPONDENT NO. | STATUS | RESULT DECLAIRED BY HONBLE. HIGH COURT | UPLOADED DATE | File |
| 1 | 3235 of 2016 | Maximum age limit for admission to law colleges. | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Pending | |||
| 2 | 2829 of 2016 | Reverification of ZERO Score Candidates. | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Diposed | The learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the present Petition. Liberty granted. Disposed of as withdrawn | 06-21-17 | Open |
| 3 | 108 of 2016 | (PIL) about wrog allotment in female Category regeneration | Bombay | LLB3 | 3 | Pending | |||
| 4 | 13820 of 2016 | about admission in cet | Bombay | LAW | 1 | Pending | |||
| 5 | 11402/2016 12600/2016 | B.ed and M.ed Course | Bombay | Bed Med | 3 | Disposed | Needless to say that we have not opined on the merits of the case and the Competent Authority is free to decide the same in accordance with law. | 10-15-16 | Open |
| 6 | 426 of 2017 | best of 5 marks 12th LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Pending | |||
| 7 | 8585 of 2017 | about intake capacity | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Pending | |||
| 8 | 18609 / 7560 of 2017 | non sequential qualification | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Pending | |||
| 9 | 1411 of 2017 | Condone the delay in Filling the online form | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | Writ Petition (L) and get the same numbered and registered on or before 08/08/2017, failing Writ Petition (L) to stand rejected under O.S. Rule 986. | 07-24-17 | Open |
| 10 | 2068 of 2017 | 10+2+3 LLB 3 year LLB 5 year | Bombay | LAW | 1 | Disposed | the writ petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. | 12-04-18 | Open |
| 11 | 5725 Of 2017 | about change in BED cet date | Bombay | Bed | 2 | Disposed | We find the Petition to be hopelessly without any meritWe find the Petition to be hopelessly without any merit and as such dismissed. | 06-28-17 | Open |
| 12 | 1059 of 2017 | non sequential qualification | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Pending | |||
| 13 | 21356 of 2017 | Govt. Law College | Bombay | LAW | 6 | Pending | |||
| 14 | 2446 / 2869 of 2017 | extension CAP Time Table | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | The Petition is accordingly disposed of having served its purpose. | 11-20-17 | Open |
| 15 | 10992 of 2017/24200 of 2017 | LLB 5 Cnadidate 11&12 | Bombay | LAW | 1 | Pending | |||
| 16 | 2296 of 2017 | LLB 3 Candidate Result Not Diklear | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Disposed | In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the present Petitions. Both the Writ Petitions are disposed of, being rendered infructuous. | 12-13-17 | Open |
| 17 | 24676 of 2017 | GLC college capacity | Bombay | LAW | 6 | Pending | |||
| 18 | 11411 of 2017 | Best of 5 marks 12th LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Disposed | In that view of the matter, we find that the petition deserves to be allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of the interim relief passed by this Court. | 11-30-17 | Open |
| 19 | 14151 of 2017 | LLB 5 Admission after cateoffdate | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Pending | |||
| 20 | 3503 of 2017 | LLB 3 year Admission | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Disposed | The Respondents are directed to upload its website so as to comply with the aforesaid directions. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. | 12-20-17 | Open |
| 21 | 2896 of 2017 | LLB 3 year Admission | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Disposed | It appears that since the matter has become infructuous, the counsel and the Petitioner have lost their interest. Disposed of having rendered infructuous. | 02-01-18 | Open |
| 22 | 4938 of 2018 | LLB 3 Year 11th Std fail, 12th Std passed by No.17 from | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Pending | |||
| 23 | 3357 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | We also expect the respondent No.2, not to act in a hypertechnical manner and deny the admission to the meritorious candidates only on the ground of inadvertent error committed by them while entering the marks in the Graduation | 11-12-18 | Open |
| 24 | 10829 of 2018 | B.ed | Bombay | Bed | 3 | Pending | |||
| 25 | 3769 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | We also expect the respondent No.2, not to act in a hypertechnical manner and deny the admission to the meritorious candidates only on the ground of inadvertent error committed by them while entering the marks in the Graduation | 11-03-18 | Open |
| 26 | 29727 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Pending | |||
| 27 | 10781 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | For the reasons recorded separately, writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (c). | 08-28-18 | Open |
| 28 | 9321 of 2018 | B.ed | Bombay | Bed | 4 | Pending | |||
| 29 | 11749 of 2018 | B.ed | Bombay | Bed | 5 | Pending | |||
| 30 | 4204 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 4 | Pending | |||
| 31 | 29510 / 11840 of 2018 | LLB 5 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | Such a relief cannot be granted in a writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is therefore, rejected. | 10-20-18 | Open |
| 32 | 10363 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | We find it appropriate that at least all the Universities, which are under the control of State of Maharashtra, there should be some uniform practice as to whether the average marks are to be considered or as to whether final year marks are to be considered, so that such unnecessary situations are avoided. | 10-15-18 | Open |
| 33 | 5704 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 1 | Pending | |||
| 34 | 6435 of 2018 | LLB | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Pending | |||
| 35 | 29597 / 11800 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | The respondent No.4 is directed to regularize the provisional admission granted to the petitioner Accordingly the Petition is disposed of as such. | 10-20-18 | Open |
| 36 | 3366 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed | The petitioner must be taken as a bona fide student and satisfying the eligibility criteria for the admission so that her further studies are not hampered. The writ petition is disposed of without examining any larger issue or controversy. | 10-11-18 | Open |
| 37 | 9653 of 2018 | LLB 5 | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Disposed | In that view of the matter, we do not find that there is any need to interfere. The Petition is disposed of by accepting the statement made on behalf of the Respondent No.1. | 09-03-18 | Open |
| 38 | 7392 of 2018 | LLB 5 | Bombay | LAW | 3 | Pending | |||
| 39 | 4886/2019 | 3yr LLB (Dynamic Procces | Bombay | LAW | 1 | Pending | |||
| 40 | 4053/2019 | 5yr LLB Eligiblity Criteria | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Pending | |||
| 41 | 786/2019 (OS) | 5yr LLB Eligiblity Criteria | Bombay | LAW | 2 | Disposed 13/03/2019 | At the request of learned Counsel for petitioner, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. | 03-15-19 | Open |
| 42 | 9325/2019 | 5yr LLB Admission Process | Bombay | LAW | 1 & 2 | Disposed | In the light of the same, the writ petition is not pressed. It is disposed of as not pressed. No costs. | 09-17-19 | |
| 43 | 2727 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Aurangabad | LAW | 2 | Pending | |||
| 44 | 98 of 2017 | about candanting here cet | Aurangabad | LAW | 2 | Disposed | We direct respondent nos.2 and 3 to take appropriate decision on the application filed by the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with the provisions of law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably, within a period of six weeks from today. With these directions, the petition stands disposed of. | 01-10-17 | Open |
| 45 | 34631 of 2017 | LLB 3 year Admission | Aurangabad | LAW | 3 | Disposed | The respondents have rightly refused the admission to the petitioner. No interference is required to be made in the said decision in the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. | 12-21-17 | Open |
| 46 | 4528 of 2017 | Inclusion of nadurbar centre LLB 3 & 5 yr. CET | Aurangabad | LAW | 2 | Disposed | Needless to state that for the allotment of Centre for next CET online examination for Law faculty, the claim of the petitioner can be considered on its own merits. With these observations and directions, writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. | 04-19-17 | Open |
| 47 | 1865 of 2018 | LLB 3 Year candidates qualification is Non sequential | Aurangabad | LAW | 3 | Pending | |||
| 48 | 9997 of 2018 | B.ed | Aurangabad | Bed | 6 | Pending | |||
| 49 | 9118 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Aurangabad | LAW | 3 | Disposed | We are in respectful agreement with the view adopted by the Full Bench of Madras High Court, which is based on correct interpretation of the provisions of the Rules of Legal Education framed by the Bar Council of India. For the reasons recorded above, there is no merit in the petition. Writ petition stands dismissed. | 10-16-18 | Open |
| 50 | 3554/2019 | B.ED-M.ED 3yr Student Not Starting To Classes | Aurangabad | Bed Med | 4 | Pending | |||
| 51 | 5025/2019 | Not Recoznise by NCTE & Not Affilated by Pune Univercity Sense 2015-16 (M.ED Courses) | Aurangabad | Med | 5 | Pending | |||
| 52 | 5024/2019 | Petitioner Institute in The Centralized Admission Process for M.ED Courses 2019-20 Student per there merit | Aurangabad | Med | 5 | Pending | |||
| 53 | 5878/2019 | Exam Time Chenging in Exam Day | Aurangabad | LAW | 1 | Disposed 30/05/2019 | The learned advocate for the petitioner therefore submits that he wants to withdraw the petition. | 05-30-19 | Open |
| 54 | 5831/2019 | Centralized Admission Process for Acadamic Year 2019-20 | Aurangabad | LAW | 6 | Pending | |||
| 55 | 10633/2019 | CAP | Aurangabad | Med | 5 | Pending | |||
| 56 | 8865/2019 | CVC Matter | Aurangabad | Bed | 1 | Disposed 19/07/19 | In case, the caste certificates of the validity holders relied by the petitioners invalidated, then the petitioners shall not be entitled for any equity nor shall be entitled to protect their admission. The Writ Petitions are disposed of. | 07-22-19 | |
| 57 | 4795 of 2018 | B.ed | Nagpur | Bed | 3 | Disposed | Subject to such an undertaking, we direct respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to permit the petitioners to participate in admission process for First Year B.Ed. Degree course admissions. Writ Petition is accordingly partly allowed and disposed of. | 08-29-18 | Open |
| 58 | 6755 of 2018 | LLB 3 | Nagpur | LLB 3 | 3 | Pending | |||
| 59 | 309 of 2017 | About B.Ed M.Ed B.P.Ed.M.P.Ed | Nagpur | .Ed M.Ed B.P.Ed.M.P.Ed | 3 | Pending | |||
| 60 | 2505 of 2018 | LLB 5 | Nagpur | LAW | 2 | Pending | |||
| 61 | 17400 of 2018 | B.ed | Nagpur | Bed | 3 | Disposed | Subject to such an undertaking, we direct respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to permit the petitioners to participate in admission process for First Year B.Ed. Degree course admissions. Writ Petition is accordingly partly allowed and disposed of. | 08-29-18 | Open |
| 62 | 10279/2019 | Permission Not given by NCTE | Nagpur | PHYSICAL EDUCATION | 5 | Pending | |||
| 63 | 10283/2019 | Permission Not given by NCTE | Nagpur | B.P.Ed | 5 | Pending | |||
| 64 | 10280/2019 | Permission Not given by NCTE | Nagpur | B.P.Ed | 5 | Pending | |||
| 65 | 6053 of 2016 | about admission after Cut of date | Nagpur | PHYSICAL EDUCATION | 3 | Disposed | On hearing the learned counsel for the respondents, we find that the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous as no admissions could be made in the academic session 201617 after the cutoff date for admission, has expired. | 11-21-16 | Open |
| 66 | 5943 of 2016 | 10+2+3 certificate LLB 3yr. | Nagpur | LLB 3 year | 2 | Disposed | The petitioner has also not pointed out that a candidate passing SSC and HSSC examinations through a Distance Education Programme would be entitled for admission to the LL.B. Course. In the absence of any material to point out that the petitioner would be entitled to admission, even if the petitioner has passed the SSC and HSSC examinations through a Distance Education Programme, the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted. | 11-29-16 | Open |
